Asylum Seekers' Lifeline: UK Tribunal Can Award Section 95 Support During Appeals Against Section 4 Discontinuation
Summary
The UK Asylum Support Tribunal (AST) has confirmed its jurisdiction to award Section 95 financial support to individuals appealing the discontinuation of their Section 4 support. This ruling is crucial for asylum seekers who face immediate destitution when their Section 4 support is cut, providing a potential safety net during the appeal process. It means that the AST can now ensure continued essential living support, preventing gaps in provision for vulnerable individuals who would otherwise be left without crucial aid.
The Asylum Support Tribunal (AST) in the UK has issued a significant ruling in the case of ML v Secretary of State for the Home Department, clarifying its powers regarding asylum support. Specifically, the AST has confirmed it possesses the jurisdiction to grant Section 95 support to an individual who is appealing against a decision by the Home Office to cease their Section 4 support. Section 4 support is typically provided to failed asylum seekers who are cooperating with return, while Section 95 is for those whose asylum claim is pending or whose appeal rights are exhausted but certain conditions are met. This ruling addresses a critical procedural gap, ensuring that individuals are not left without any form of essential support during the often-lengthy appeal process.
This decision has a profound practical impact on asylum applicants, particularly those who have had their Section 4 support discontinued. Previously, individuals in such a situation risked immediate destitution while their appeal against the discontinuation was being processed, as there was ambiguity about the AST's power to bridge this gap with Section 95. Now, the AST can proactively intervene to provide Section 95 support, covering accommodation and subsistence. This provides a vital safeguard, preventing homelessness and extreme poverty for vulnerable individuals navigating the complex asylum system and reduces the chances of them being forced onto the streets.
Background
Historically, the provision of asylum support in the UK has been fragmented, with different sections (e.g., Section 4, Section 95) covering various stages of the asylum process and different eligibility criteria, often leading to gaps in provision. This ruling addresses a long-standing issue regarding the continuity of support during transitions or appeals between these different sections, particularly when support is withdrawn.
Who This Affects
- Asylum seekers appealing the discontinuation of their Section 4 support are directly affected, as they now have a clear pathway to potentially receive Section 95 support during their appeal.
- Individuals facing destitution after their Section 4 support is withdrawn will benefit from this decision, as it provides a mechanism to secure essential accommodation and financial aid.
- Legal representatives and charities supporting asylum seekers will find it easier to advocate for their clients' continued support, utilizing this clarified jurisdiction of the Asylum Support Tribunal.
What You Should Do Now
- If your Section 4 support is discontinued, immediately seek legal advice from an immigration solicitor or a reputable asylum support charity.
- Ensure you understand your eligibility for Section 95 support and be prepared to submit an application or appeal against the discontinuation of Section 4 support, citing this tribunal decision.
- Gather all relevant documentation regarding your asylum claim status and financial circumstances to support any application for continued support to the Asylum Support Tribunal.
Key Takeaway
The UK Asylum Support Tribunal now has confirmed power to grant Section 95 support to prevent destitution for asylum seekers appealing the loss of their Section 4 support.
Source: Read official article on Free Movement (UK)
Publisher note — NaviBound summarizes cited third-party sources for convenience only. Confirm all requirements with the linked official announcement and qualified professionals. Not legal advice. Display date: Jun 09, 2026. Editorial policy